“Over ____% of churches in America have plateau’ed.”  (The percentage depends on who’s talking.)

Let the pastor dedicate himself to growing the church as much as possible.

Let growing the church be important to the shepherd.

But let the growth be the real thing, not something hyped up.  Solid growth, not inflated numbers.

A generation or two ago, pastors in our denomination took it for granted that if they wanted to (ahem) move up to a larger church, they needed to show numerical growth where they were presently serving.

Before long, some less trustworthy preachers decided to play that game to the hilt and ruined it for everyone. They grew creative in their counting, they schemed and plotted and even lied about numbers, and doctored the records to make it appear they were experiencing greater growth than they were.

They had special days with celebrities and entertainment and free giveaways.  They bused people in from far and near to balloon their statistics. They did anything they could to inflate the numbers.

Soon, even pastors who had their hearts right (and heads on straight!) became swept up in the movement.  If college professors were sentenced to “publish or perish,” pastors in our denomination were expected to produce big numbers or remain at Podunk forever.

Search committees gradually wised up

Eventually, churches in search of pastors caught on to what was happening.  They began to see that big numbers did not guarantee a pastor was growing his church or could even preach.  The certain thing they did guarantee was that the preacher was a promoter.

A lot of churches ended up with promoters in the pulpit and gimmicks in place of ministries.  They had been conned and paid dearly for their mistake.

Gradually, search committees quit expecting pastoral candidates to grow a church and started looking for other indicators, what they would have called “more reliable ways to gauge a ministry.”

Here’s my story…

In the early 1980s,  a large church in Texas was considering inviting me to become their new pastor.  They liked everything they saw–they said–with one exception:  I had not baptized very many the year before.  Something like 38, as I recall.  Our usual numbers were in the 70s and 80s.  That committee required larger numbers, even though they didn’t put it in so many words. They would have simply said, “We want an evangelistic pastor.”

I did not excuse our low numbers, and didn’t make up alibis, even though they kept inviting me to do so. “Surely there was a reason for the low baptisms last year?”  I said, “None that I can think of.  I did the same thing I always do, and we just had an off year.”  But, rather than take a chance, they moved on. Which was fine, by the way, because I had no inkling the Lord was leading me there anyway.

Such churches may have had good intentions, but they often fell into a trap. They sometimes called pastors with the big numbers only to discover these had been inflated.  But now they were stuck with the man.

Lowered expectations

So, what we have these days, in the second decade of the 21st century, is churches where almost no one is expecting growth. Sadly, since no one is expecting it, few pastors devote themselves to achieving it.

I see no Sunday School campaigns, no community-wide evangelistic events, no door-to-door outreach.  I hardly know of a single church with a weekly visitation night.

More and more, if the bills are paid and the attendance is holding its own, everyone is happy.

I’m all in favor of churches supporting their pastors and the deacons not pressuring the pastor to adopt their agenda.  What I’m longing for–calling for, actually–is for pastors to experience that inner drive to reach more people for Jesus and to grow their congregation in ways that matter.

I am not calling for a return to inflated numbers and artificial growth.

Twenty-five years ago, a church caught up in the numbers thing wrote to say my name had been given to them as a potential pastor.  “If you are interested in being considered,” the letter said, “please fill out the enclosed application and return to us.”

Among the questions on the application–a term which I find offensive, by the way–was this:  “List the revivals which you have preached in the last ten years, and give the number of conversions in each one.”

I wrote in the blank: “I do not keep such records. And if I were you, I would think twice about any preacher who does.”

Apparently, they found such a one and called him.  If anything ever happened in that church during his administration, I never heard. I suspect they got what they were asking for: a pastor adept at the numbers game, who didn’t mind manipulating the church and everyone around him to pull it off.

This is a huge subject and one burdensome to a lot of God’s people.  I’ll end this with this word from The Word:  “Grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ” (2 Peter 3:18).