Question Everything on the Internet, Including This!

I made a preacher mad at me the other day. I apologized and he forgave me, but I don’t regret what I did.

Here’s what happened.

I received an email from the man of God telling how a group of liberals is petitioning the Federal Communications Commission to end religious programming in the United States. This would stop Charles Stanley, David Jeremiah, and a whole host of religious programmers from broadcasting their messages.

The e-mail was a “forward,” of course. My friend had not written it, but merely read it with alarm and forwarded it to dozens of his friends.

I clicked on “reply all,” which sent my response to everyone who had received his note.

I said, “My dear brother, where have you been! This is a hoax! It has been around for nearly 40 years. The FCC never was petitioned to stop religious programming and couldn’t if it wanted to.”

I added, “This meaningless petition has been circling the earth for all these decades, causing gullible, although well-meaning, Christians to tie up God’s resources and their time in bombarding the FCC with thousands and thousands of pieces of mail every year.”

“Christians of all people should not pass this stuff along when they can’t verify it,” I said.

That’s how I hurt his feelings. So, I apologized.

Then, last week, that same petition arrived again.


This time, having learned my lesson, I sent along a nice short note to say that it was not true, that people can check it out on snopes or truthorfiction or any of the other hoax-busting websites.

The sweet friend who had sent it came back and explained that since it had arrived in her mailbox from a well-known and highly respected church on the East Coast, she felt it had to be authentic.

That’s the very kind of thinking that has kept this fiction alive for four decades. God’s people have more zeal for righteousness than commitment to truth, so we will pass along reports of an attack on what is good and right without checking to see if it actually is authentic.

Can you say “gullible”? Let’s be honest; that is the word.

Here is another such erroneous e-mail, if you think you can stomach this.

A close family member–we’ll call her Sue–sent one that goes like this: “On July 8, 1947, a little over 60 years ago, a UFO with 5 aliens aboard crashed onto a sheep ranch just outside Roswell, New Mexico. This is a well-known incident that many say has long been covered up by the Air Force and other federal agencies. However, what you may not be aware of is that in the month of April 1948, nine months after that historic day, the following people were born: Albert Gore, Jr., Hillary Rodham, John F. Kerry, William J. Clinton, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, Dianne Feinstein, Charles Schumer, and Barbara Boxer.”

I replied to Sue: “I’ve seen that before, and seriously question it. For one thing, I happen to know that Nancy Pelosi is my age. Makes me wonder about the birthdates of the others.”

Well, Sue went online and found the birthdates of each of those: Gore 3-31-1948; Hillary 10-26-47; Bill Clinton 8-19-46; Kerry 12-11-43; Dean 11-17-48; Feinstein 6-22-33; Schumer 11-23-50; Boxer 11-11-40, and Pelosi 3-26-40.

She wrote, “Close only counts in horseshoes, huh?”

(Now, please notice something: Sue said these are the birthdates. But I did not check. I’m wondering about Dianne Feinstein’s, for example. Could that 1933 be a typo? Since none of our readers know who my friend Sue is, you have no way of knowing whether she simply made up these birthdates or whether they are authentic! Frustratin’, ain’t it?)

Makes you wonder what in the sam hill the originator of that little piece was thinking?

For my money, this is in the same category as a spammer.

Some person with more creativity than integrity seems to have decided, “Believe I’ll come up with something outrageous to fill the boxes of all those gullible people who read this stuff and pass it on mindlessly?”

And because we quote stuff we read as though it were the truth without checking and pass along slanderous attacks on those we disagree with without taking a moment to verify its genuineness, we play into the hands of such mean-spirited people.

No wonder outsiders think Christians are mindless. No wonder they think Conservative Christians are stupid.

Because sometimes we are.

I’m sorry. But it’s true.

Several years ago, when I told a friend that the petition against the FCC was a hoax and that the federal agency received millions of pointless petitions a year for this foolishness, she tried to defend herself. “Well, I think we’re doing good.”

I said, “How is this good?”

She answered, “We’re rousing God’s people to take action against attacks on our sacred rights. We’re letting the feds know we’re out here.”

I said, “We let them know we don’t care for truth! We are sending a message, all right, but not the kind that we ought to be proud of!”

Question everything, friend. Forward very little of it. Particularly–please!–never ever forward something that ends with, “If you are a person who cares for others, forward this to ten people.”

When I get to that place, I don’t care what it is, I hit ‘delete.’

I suggest you do the same. But it’s up to you. Use your best judgement. Which, I hope you noticed, is the point of this long article!

13 thoughts on “Question Everything on the Internet, Including This!

  1. “…for the assembly was in confusion, and most of them did not know why they had come together.”Acts 19:32b Not judging…just saying…verify once and verify again!

  2. I have read that a lot of these messages which get forwarded (for a good cause) are ready targets for those who would send viruses (or virii?) to our computers. Especially those that ask you to add your name on the bottom of the list before passing it along and when the 1000th person signs, mail it to …

  3. I wonder how many preachers alert their congregations to these nonexistent threats. Some time ago, I had some folks urge me to alert our congregation about HIV tainted needles being placed the handles of gas pumps. The e-mail quoted a sergeant with the Jacksonville, FL police dept. I picked up the phone, dialed information, and got a number which turned out to be the Jacksonville sheriff’s office. When the man answered the phone, I said, “I’m sorry. I was trying to reach the police department.” Graciously, but with a tone of weariness, he said, “Jacksonville doesn’t have a police department, there is no Sergeant so and so, and we’ve never heard of anyone putting needles in gas pump handles.” We actually talked for a while about this ridiculous trend of alarmism.

    Whether it’s Christians being attacked, Barack Obama saying something outrageous, or public safety alerts (people stealing kidneys, rapes in Wal-Mart parking lots, etc.), we are irresponsible and foolish if we pass the information along without fact-checking. Another timely word, Joe.

    Oh, and yes they did take “In God We Trust” off the face of nickels–but they put it on the edge which, in my opinion, give the statement more prominence (and this was done under George Bush’s administration–not Obama’s).

  4. I usually do not pass these along, because many of these are used to “harvest” email addresses for spamming! I also check snopes.com to verify any that I receive.

  5. The UFO-Roswell email is a political joke not to be taken seriously! And, snopes.com is not the final authority on things. Check some other sites like urbanlegends.com

  6. This religious broadcast thing is exhibit #2 in my argument for eternal life (Jesus’ resurrection from the dead being number 1). This thing will live forever. I get it about once a month. Amazing! And some people still have doubts about the historical Jesus but will “buy into” this scam w/o flinching.

    Lonnie

  7. I may have made enemies by repeatedly looking the stuff up on snopes to copy and paste it in a return email. I think it’s taught some to ck before forwarding to me. Ironically, I got caught on one I posted recently on FB, when a friend I had taught to ck with scopes pointed out to me that it was baloney. I red-facededly retracted!

  8. One time I was sent a prayer request that sounded familiar (pregnant wife of soldier in Irag has cancer); checked snopes and it was 8 years old and the person had in fact recovered (and the soldier was in KY, not Iraq). I replied to all about this, that maybe we should make sure these things are true before forwarding them (it took less than a minute to check on snopes).

    I got lambasted for a day because I was “a pastor who is against prayer.”

    Mr. Mckeever’s statement about Christians loving righteousness more than truth is dead on. In fact, many Christians don’t even have a warm fuzzy for truth.

  9. Every time I mention checking snopes.com, I get notes from people telling me how unreliable it is. I reply with something like, “I don’t care what people use to check on these things–urbanlegends.com or truthorfiction.com or snopes. If nothing else, check with your brother-in-law, but check somewhere! Don’t just mindlessly pass along stuff you know nothing about.”

    Joe

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.