Winston Churchill was the ultimate dinner guest.
He was, that is, unless you wanted to get a word in edgewise.
Churchill monopolized the conversation, we are told. He did this particularly if the setting was his home in Chartwell and you were the guest. Even one guest was an audience and the man most assuredly did love an audience.
I suspect most preachers have that in common with him.
Now, if we have to sit there and listen to someone go on for an hour or more, most of us would prefer the speaker be a Winston Churchill. Or Thomas Jefferson or Ben Franklin.
But Churchill did something which made his conversation so unforgettable and his speeches so noteworthy: He planned in advance his little set speeches. Which is to say, he prepared his spontaneous remarks.