My friend stirred up a furor.
Writing on Facebook, my friend Stan told of a pastor search committee that has just angered him by their treatment of a wonderful young pastor.
As he told it, the committee and the pastor met on several occasions, they heard him preach numerous times, and it was clear to all that “this was of God.” The process worked itself out over several months. The committee voted unanimously that this pastor was their choice. The pastor himself agreed.
All was well, it seemed.
And then one day, the chairman phoned the pastor. “I have bad news,” he said. “While everyone is unanimous that you are our choice for the church, however, when we voted on bringing your name before the church as our recommendation, two members of the committee voted ‘no.’”
The vote was 7 for and 2 against.
The two ‘nay-sayers’ on the committee told the rest of the group that while they loved the pastor-candidate and agree he seems to be “the one” God is leading them to, “We just don’t want to go with the first person we talked to.”
They wanted it to be a popularity contest. Find out “who else is out there.”
Since search committees are expected to bring only unanimous recommendations before the church, the chairman felt he had no choice but to accept his committee’s actions and shut down their dealings with that pastor.
You can imagine how the pastor felt after hanging up the phone. Disappointment. Anger perhaps. Frustration. Puzzlement.
There was nothing the pastor could do about this. He was at the mercy of the committee.